|
Great Expectations By Johann
Christoph Arnold of
ChristophArnold.com
I have always been regretting that I was not as wise as the day
I was born. - Henry David Thoreau
In a magazine piece I recently read about a Kenyan school that holds its classes
in a shady grove outdoors, the headmaster (who had helped plant the trees as a
child) recalled an African saying: "When you plant a tree, never plant only one.
Plant three - one for shade, one for fruit, and one for beauty." On a continent
where heat and drought make every tree valuable, that's wise advice. It's an
intriguing educational insight too, especially in a time like ours, when vast
numbers of children are endangered by a one-sided approach that sees them solely
in terms of their ability to be fruitful - that is, to "achieve" and "succeed."
The pressure to excel is transforming childhood as never before. Naturally,
parents have always wanted their children to "do well," both academically and
socially. No one wants their child to be the slowest in the class, the last to
be picked for a game on the field. But what is it about the culture we live in
that has made that natural worry into such an obsessive fear, and what is it
doing to our children? What is achievement, anyway? And what is success, other
than some vague, lofty ideal?
My mother used to say that education begins in the cradle, and not one of
today's gurus would disagree. But the differences in their approach are
instructive. Whereas women of her generation sang their babies to sleep just as
their mothers had done - because a baby loves the sound of its mother's voice -
today's tend to cite studies on the positive effects of Mozart on the
development of the infant brain. Fifty years ago, women nursed their babies and
taught their toddlers finger games as a matter of course; today, most do
neither, despite endless chatter about the importance of bonding and nurture.
As an author I became aware, after completing my first book, of something I had
never noticed previously: the importance of white space. White space is the room
between the lines of type, the margins, extra space at the beginning of a
chapter, a page left blank at the beginning of the book. It allows the type to
"breathe" and gives the eye a place to rest. White space is not something you're
conscious of when you read a book. It is what isn't there. But if it were gone,
you'd notice it right away. It is the key to a well-designed page.
Just as books require white space, so do children. That is, they need room to
grow. Unfortunately, too many children aren't getting that. In the same way that
we tend to overwhelm them with material things, we tend to over-stimulate and
over-steer. We deny them the time, space, and flexibility they need to develop
at their own pace.
The ancient Chinese philosopher Lao-Tzu reminds us that "it is not the clay the
potter throws that gives the jar its usefulness, but the space within." Children
need stimulation and guidance, but they also need time to themselves. Hours
spent alone in daydreams or in quiet, unstructured activities instill a sense of
security and independence and provide a necessary lull in the rhythm of the day.
Children thrive on silence too. Without external distractions they will often
become so consumed by what they are doing that they will be totally oblivious of
everything around them. Unfortunately, silence is such a luxury that they are
rarely allowed the opportunity for such undisturbed concentration. Whatever the
setting - mall, elevator, restaurant, or car - the low murmur (or blare) of
piped-in music or background noise is incessantly there.
As for the importance of giving children unstructured time, nineteenth-century
writer Johann Christoph Blumhardt warns against the temptation to constantly
intrude, and emphasizes the value of spontaneous activity: "That is their first
school; they are teaching themselves, as it were. I often have the feeling that
angels are around children...and that whoever is so clumsy as to disturb a child
provokes his angel." Certainly there is nothing wrong with giving a child chores
and requiring him to carry them out on a daily basis. But the way many parents
overbook their children, emotionally and timewise, robs them of the scope they
need to develop on their own.
It is a beautiful thing to see a child thoroughly absorbed in his play; in fact,
it is hard to think of a purer, more spiritual activity. Play brings joy,
contentment, and detachment from the troubles of the day. And especially
nowadays, in our hectic, time - and money - driven culture, the importance of
those things for every child cannot be emphasized enough. Educator Friedrich
Froebel, the father of the modern kindergarten, goes so far as to say that "a
child who plays thoroughly and perseveringly, until physical fatigue forbids,
will be a determined adult, capable of self-sacrifice both for his own welfare
and that of others." In an age when fears of playground injuries and the
misguided idea that play interferes with "real" learning has led some forty
percent of the school districts across the country to do away with recess, one
can only hope that the wisdom of these words will not go entirely unheeded.
Allowing children the room to grow at their own pace does not mean ignoring
them. Clearly, the bedrock of their security from day to day is the knowledge
that we who care for them are always at hand, ready to help them, to talk with
them, to give them what they need, and simply to "be there" for them. But how
often are we swayed instead by our own ideas of what they want or need?
After the massacre at Columbine High School in April 1999, administrators rushed
to provide psychologists and counselors to help traumatized students process
their grief. But the teenagers didn't want to see experts. Though many privately
sought professional help later, on their own terms, they first flocked to local
churches and youth centers, where they dealt with their grief by talking to
their peers.
The tendency to intervene, especially when a child is in trouble, is a natural
one, but even then (perhaps especially then) it is vital to be sensitive to the
child's needs. That's what Nicole, a mother of four, learned when their quiet
English village was rocked by a savage murder:
"In June 1996 a local woman and her daughter were beaten to death near the edge
of our property, while walking home from the local elementary school. A second
daughter was beaten too, though she survived. My daughters, who were six and
eight, had often played with the girls, who were the same age. Days and nights
of tears followed - in fact, my daughters still wept at intervals months after
the incident.
As a mother, I was naturally worried about the traumatic effects of the crime,
and the whereabouts of the murderer (who is still at large). I was tempted to
question my children as to how they were doing and what they were thinking about
the whole thing. But I tried to refrain. I knew that to help them, I needed to
hear what they had to say - what their own spontaneous reactions were - and not
impose or project my own motherly ideas on them first...
Amazingly, they never spoke once in fear of our neighbors' murderer, as every
adult in the area was doing. Instead, they asked, "Why did that man hate them so
much? They didn't do anything to him..."
In the weeks after the murder, well-meaning friends repeatedly urged us to "move
on." "Don't let your children get hung up on this gruesome event," they warned
us. "Help them get over it as quickly as possible." But I couldn't. At that
point my children needed to grieve, and I could not bring myself to subject them
to adult ideas about healing."
In 'Ordinary Resurrections', his new book about children in the South Bronx,
Jonathan Kozol reflects on another angle of the same issue: the way adults tend
to guide children through even the most casual conversations. He says it, too,
is a result of our tendency to hurry - and our reluctance to let them sort life
out in their own way, at their own pace.
"Children pause a lot when reaching for ideas. They get distracted. They meander
- blissfully, it seems - through acres of magnificent irrelevance. We think we
know the way they're heading in a conversation, and we get impatient, like a
traveler who wants to "cut the travel time." We want to get there quicker. It
does speed up the pace of things, but it can also change the destination."
Of all the ways in which we push children to meet adult expectations, the trend
toward high-pressure academics may be the most widespread, and the worst. I say
"worst" because of the age at which children begin to be subjected to it, and
the fact that for some of them school quickly becomes a place they dread, and a
source of misery they cannot escape for months at a time.
As someone whose scholastic career included plenty of mediocre grades, I am
familiar enough with the dread that accompanies bringing home a report card.
Thankfully, my parents cared far more about whether I got along with my peers
than whether I achieved an A or a B. Even when I failed a class, they refrained
from scolding me, and eased my anxieties by assuring me that there was a lot
more in my head than I or my teachers realized; it just hadn't come to the
surface yet. According to Melinda, a veteran preschool teacher in California,
such encouragement is only a dream for many children, especially in homes where
academic failure is seen as unacceptable.
"We have parents asking whether their two-and-a-half-year-olds are learning to
read yet, and grumbling if they can't. The pressure some parents put on children
is just incredible. I see children literally shaking and crying because they
don't want to go in to testing. I've even seen parents dragging their child into
the room...
I had a little boy one year, Miles, whose parents were pushing him to get him
ready to enter a very expensive private school. I bumped into his father at the
beginning of the next school year and he said, "You know, Miles has been so
stressed out that we're going to get him into counseling." It was true that
Miles was stressed out, but I was sure it was because of the rigorous testing
they'd put him through during the summer...He had started crying the day of the
testing, and he'd cried every day since then."
In some instances, the frenzy to compete begins even before a child is ready to
start school, as this recent newspaper column about the trials of one New York
City couple shows:
"A couple of weeks ago, she and her husband got word that their five-year-old
son had been skunked at all six private schools they applied to for next fall's
kindergarten class. "Don't worry," the head of their nursery school had assured
them. "You will certainly get into at least one of your top choices."
Famous last words. For whatever reasons, all six schools passed on their bright
son with the winning smile and splendid test scores. That tattoo of rejection
hurt, she admits. Nor did it help to learn that other families landed in the
same boat.
Now comes the hard part...Do they move, reluctantly, out of town? Do they keep
their son in nursery school for now and try the private-school rat race again
next year? Do they sigh in resignation and send him to the local public school?
The dilemma facing this couple is a measure of how frantic life has become...in
a world of strivers. "People are twisting themselves inside out," the woman
said. "You slap yourself around and say, 'It's only kindergarten.' We're not
talking about cancer. But it changes your life...Besides," she added, "the
parental community can be vicious... Your child's admissions profile becomes a
measure of your success. That's the yuckiest part of it. These are babies we're
talking about."
In the end, she said, she and her husband will probably keep their son in his
present nursery and then go through the private-school drill once more, next
year. "That's what tears me up," she said. "He has to be paraded like a show
horse again."
It's true the examples above represent the extreme end of the spectrum. Still,
they cannot be dismissed, because they shed light on a disturbing trend that
affects education at all levels. More and more, it seems that we have lost sight
of the "child" in childhood and turned it into a joyless training camp for the
adult world. Jonathan Kozol writes:
"From around the age of six or seven, and up to eleven or maybe twelve, the
gentleness and honesty - the sweetness - of children is so apparent. Our society
has missed an opportunity to seize that moment. It's almost as though we view
those qualities as useless, as though we don't value children for their
gentleness, but only as future economic units, as future workers, as future
assets or deficits.
When you read political debates on how much we should spend on children, you'll
notice that the argument usually has nothing to do with whether children deserve
a gentle and happy childhood, but whether investment in their education will pay
off economically twenty years later. I always think, why not invest in them
simply because they're children and deserve to have some fun before they die?
Why not invest in their gentle hearts as well as in their competitive skills?"
The answer, of course, is that we have abandoned the idea of education as
growth, and decided to see it only as a ticket to the job market. Guided by
charts and graphs, and cheered on by experts, we have turned our backs on the
value of uniqueness and creativity and fallen instead for the lie that the only
way to measure a child's progress is a standardized test. Not only are we
neglecting to plant trees for shade and beauty - we are planting for only one
variety of fruit. Or, as Malvina Reynolds puts it in her song "Little Boxes":
And they all play on the golf course,
and drink their martinis dry,
And they all have pretty children,
and the children go to school,
And the children go to summer camp,
and then to the university,
Where they put them all in boxes,
and they come out all the same.
Granted, children ought to be stretched and intellectually
stimulated. They should be taught to articulate their feelings, to write, to
read, to develop and defend an idea; to think critically. But what is the
purpose of the best academic education if it fails to prepare children for the
"real" world beyond the confines of the classroom? What about those life-skills
that can never be taught by putting a child on a bus and sending him to school?
As for the things that schools are supposed to teach, even they are not always
passed on. Writer John Taylor Gatto points out that though American children sit
through an average of 12,000 hours of compulsory academic instruction, there are
plenty who leave the system as 17- and 18-year-olds who still can't read a book
or calculate a batting average - let alone repair a faucet or change a flat.
It is not just schools that are pressuring children into growing up too fast.
The practice of rushing children into adulthood is so widely accepted and so
thoroughly ingrained that people often go blank when you voice your concern
about the matter. Take, for example, the number of parents who tie up their
children's after-school hours in extracurricular activities. On the surface, the
explosion of opportunities for "growth" in things like music and sports might
look like the perfect answer to the boredom faced by millions of latchkey
children. But the reality is not always so pretty. Tom, an acquaintance with
friends in suburban Baltimore, says:
"It's one thing when a child picks up a hobby, a sport, or an instrument on her
own steam, but quite another when the driving force is a parent with an overly
competitive edge. In one family I know - I'll call them the Joneses - Sarah
showed a genuine talent for the piano in the second grade, but by the time she
was in the sixth, she wouldn't touch a keyboard for any amount of coaxing. She
was tired of the attention, sick of lessons (her father was always reminding her
what a privilege they were), and virtually traumatized by the strain of having
been pushed through one competition after another. Yes, Sarah played Bach
beautifully at seven. But at ten she was interested in other things."
In the case above, and countless others, the pattern is all too familiar:
ambitious expectations are followed by the pressure to meet them, and what was
once a perfectly happy part of a child's life becomes a burden that is
impossible to bear.
Einstein once wrote that if you want brilliant children, read them fairy tales.
"And if you want them to be more brilliant, read them more fairy tales."
Obviously, such a quip is not the sort of answer an expert might give to the
discouraging trends described above. But I still believe it is a thought worth
reflecting on. It is the inventive sort of wisdom without which we will never
pull ourselves out of the ruts we are currently stuck in.
As for the parental desire to have brilliant children in the first place, it is
surely just another sign of our distorted vision - a reflection of the way we
tend to view children as little adults, no matter how loudly we may protest such
a "Victorian" idea. And the best antidote to that is to drop all of our adult
expectations entirely, to get down on the same level as our children, to look
them in the eye. Only then will we begin to hear what they are saying, to find
out what they are thinking, and to see the goals we have set for them from their
point of view. Only then will we be able to lay aside our ambitions and
recognize, as poet Jane Tyson Clement puts it:
child, though I am meant to teach you much,
what is it, in the end,
except that together we are
meant to be children
of the same Father,
and I must unlearn all the adult structure
and the cumbering years
and you must teach me
to look at the earth and the heaven
with your fresh wonder.
"Unlearning" our adult mindsets is never easy, especially at the
end of a long day, when children can sometimes seem more of a bother than a
gift. When there are children around, things just don't always go as planned.
Furniture gets scratched, flower beds trampled, new clothes torn or muddied,
toys lost and broken. Children want to handle things and play with them. They
want to have fun, to run in the aisles; they need space to be rambunctious and
silly and noisy. After all, they are not china dolls or little adults, but
unpredictable rascals with sticky fingers and runny noses who sometimes cry at
night. Yet if we truly love them, we will welcome them as they are.
*************************************
Johann Christoph
Arnold is a family counselor, author, and pastor with the Bruderhof Communities
(
http://www.bruderhof.com ). Read more of his articles and books at
http://ChristophArnold.com . Copyright 2003 Bruderhof Communities.
|